|Back to Index Page|
Congressman Too Truthful
Ron Paul, MD
U.S. Congressman Ron Paul - House of Representatives 203 Cannon - Washington D.C. 20515
Taken from http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/truthful-paul.html. Visit his official website Project Freedom. See his biography at: http://www.house.gov/paul/bio.htm.
"Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers' ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are." Comment from a US Congressman.
First published in this website on September 9, 2003. Article originally written by Dr. Ron Paul in 1996.
What Dr. Paul tells us here does not just apply to the United States, don't be fooled by words, just replace his words like the federal government, for instance, by the name of your local government, it is applicable to any country in the world that is under direct or indirect Illuminati control. It is the same scheme, the same Holographic Prison wherever you go. Here he points out the basic US policies that one way or another affect the rest of the world.
What is NESARA?
by the Dove of Oneness
|Peace and Prosperity for All!|
[Excerpt from Dove Report of September 8, 2003.]
Often I hear from people who dont realize there are members of the U.S. Congress who wish to clean up the corrupt banking, government, and legal systems of this country. Below is a document written by Ron Paul in 1996. He speaks of the terrible things the Clinton Administration was doing to our country in the 90s.
When Clinton was in office, I wrote critical comments about the Clinton administration and those of you who were reading the Dove Reports in year 2000 are aware that I was critical of Clinton. I was critical of Clinton many times and of the well-publicized anti-terrorist exercises led by Janet Reno; I was very aware that these totally unnecessary anti-terrorist exercises were propaganda to make Americans think there were terrorists. But the terrorists were and are working for the U.S. government. The Clinton administration did its part to spread the propaganda of terrorists to prepare Americans for the great harm done by the Bush regimes 9/11 attacks on Americans.
I am not a fan of Bill Clinton nor of Hillary Clinton; it is obvious that Bill Clinton has been Illuminati, regardless of what he may say now. I know some other very dedicated and sincere NESARA supporters have recently made positive comments about Bill Clinton, however, those are their opinions and not mine.
I write about the Clintons rarely because they are not the main ones causing the problems right now. The major trouble-makers in the U.S. are the Rockefellers who are Democrats, by the way, and their very good friends and relatives, the Bush Senior family, who are Republicans.
When we learn the TRUTH about our government, we will see that there have been very few honest men in the oval office. We will learn that there are Illuminati in BOTH the Republican and Democrat parties and that the Illuminati are NOT Americans. Theyre not Democrats or Republicans; they are GLOBALISTS. This is how they see themselves: as members of an elite bunch of Illuminati globalists who are trying to control the world. They have zero loyalty to our people or our nation or any other people or nation; they have proven this over the years.
The Illuminati always have their people in all major political parties. This is true in every country in the world where the Illuminati are pulling strings.
The Illuminati use the divide and conquer strategy which is, members of different political parties publicly denouncing each other while in secret meetings they plot together to deceive the worlds people. When NESARA takes us back to Constitutional Law the Illuminati will LOSE their ability to control our country through political parties.
In the article below Ron Paul discusses the truth about our federal government. NESARA will clear up most of the problems in the federal government which Ron Paul exposes. NESARA Yes!
Dove Note: Per my request today, September 8, 2003, for confirmation on the article below, Ron Pauls office staff says this article is six years old, PUBLISHED in 1996. His staff also says that Ron Paul feels the same way about these topics today.
The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. Government.
As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressmen are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real "third rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew.
I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a very limited role for Washington, D.C.
If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U. S. membership in the U.N.; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor"; No American troops in 100 foreign countries; no NAFTA, GATT, or "fast-track"; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; and no income tax. We can get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited.
That system is called Liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a tread mill working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives.
Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There's not supposed to be any federal police, according to the Constitution. Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claimed those 81 church members including 19 children, burned down their own Church, killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put a few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years.
We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms talk about an unconstitutional agency rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for a big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gun ship, to shoot the roof of a church full of innocents.
The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the Feds sent in tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas.
Now, CS gas is banned and under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in war. But it could and did use it against American civilians.
After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flames, and all 81 people men, women, children, and babies were incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set the fire? Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a defense against bullets? Or did the Davidians, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves?
A new documentary Waco: Rules of Engagement may show, throughout FLIR infrared photography, FBI snipers killing the Davidians by shooting through the back of the church, where no media cameras were allowed. This film won a prize at the Sundance Film Festival. It was made by people who took government's side, until they investigated. Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its hands, and not only from Waco. And the refusal of corrupt perverse liberals to admit it means nothing.
It my interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, in the federal murders at Ruby Ridge' especially the FBI snipers shot that blast apart the head of the young mother holding her baby caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power. Then uttered the sentiment that caused the media hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to be left alone.
Whoa! You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans, and of course the media, in Washington, in my home state of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist". (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?). I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my many opponents were outraged that a congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!" said a typical big-city newspaper editorial.
But the media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get anything right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for a special interest (so he can get keep ripping-off the taxpayers). But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I put up with all of the abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension. I'm in this fight for reason. I want to hand on to my children and grandchildren, and to you in your family, a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution, an America worthy of her history. I'll not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way. I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of Liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel. Won't you help me do this work?
Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the U.N.. But Jefferson and the other Founders would recognize our government, and our descendants would bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code. I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS, and ?.
Recently, I asked a famous Republican Committee Chairman who's always talking about getting rid of the IRS why engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need [it] for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Unions says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend". You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve . [http://www.luisprada.com/Protected/social_decay_and_the_federal_reserve.htm].
The value of our dollar in the level of our interest rates are not suppose to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only constitutional money is gold and silver, not notes redeemable in them. Not fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve our money could not be inflated at the behest of big government or big banks. Your income in savings would not lose their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse. They aren't natural to the free market; there caused by the schemers at the Fed.
President Andrew Jackson called the 19th centurys Fed " The Monster" because it was a vehicle for inflation and all sorts of special-interest corruption. Let me tell you, things haven't changed a bit. I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave owning elitists," they seek to dumb down all our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there at no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use in the U.S. Congress.
But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says, and the Bible too.
And then there's my least favorite topic, the U.N. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the U.N., and the U.N. itself taking a hike. After all, the U.N. is socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with a "blond and a case of Scotch" one U.N. ambassador once said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers in U.N. uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing U.N. blue, he was kicked out of the American Army. What an outrage! Not one dime for the U.N., and not one American soldier! Not Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know its radical, but how about devoting American military efforts to defending America, and only America?
Such ideas, said one newspaper reporter, make me a maverick, who will never go far because he won't go along to get along. Darn right! What does "go far" mean? Get a big government job? To heck with that. And I won't sell my vote for pork either. When I walked through the U.S. Capitol this morning, I got angry. The building is filled with statues and paintings of Jefferson, Madison, and the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep it that way. When I was first elected, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. That's exactly what I'm fighting for. Such ideas drive the liberals crazy.
Join this fight for the Constitution, and stop those who want to rip it up, and throw it in the Potomac. Together we can join the Founders fight. Together we can make this history.
Washington D.C. 20515
Surrender Should Not Be an Option
Taken from: http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst090207.htm
Faced with dwindling support of the Iraq War, the war-hawks are redoubling their efforts. They imply we are in Iraq attacking those who attacked us, and yet this is not the case. As we know, Saddam Hussein, though not a particularly savory character, had nothing to do with 9/11. The neo-cons claim surrender should not be an option. In the same breath they claim we were attacked because of our freedoms. Why then, are they so anxious to surrender our freedoms with legislation like the Patriot Act, a repeal of our 4th amendment rights, executive orders, and presidential signing statements? With politicians like these, who needs terrorists? Do they think if we destroy our freedoms for the terrorists they will no longer have a reason to attack us? This seems the epitome of cowardice coming from those who claim a monopoly on patriotic courage.
In any case, we have achieved the goals specified in the initial authorization. Saddam Hussein has been removed. An elected government is now in place in Iraq that meets with US approval. The only weapon of mass destruction in Iraq is our military presence. Why are we still over there? Conventional wisdom would dictate that when the "mission is accomplished", the victor goes home, and that is not considered a retreat.
They claim progress is being made and we are fighting a winnable war, but this is not a view connected with reality. We can't be sure when we kill someone over there if they were truly an insurgent or an innocent Iraqi civilian. There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with. There are no measurable goals to be achieved at this point.
The best congressional leadership can come up with is the concept of strategic redeployment, or moving our troops around, possibly into Saudi Arabia or even, alarmingly enough, into Iran. Rather than ending this war, we could be starting another one.
The American people voted for a humble foreign policy in 2000. They voted for an end to the war in 2006. Instead of recognizing the wisdom and desire of the voters, they are chided as cowards, unwilling to defend themselves. Americans are fiercely willing to defend themselves. However, we have no stomach for indiscriminate bombing in foreign lands when our actual attackers either killed themselves on 9/11 or are still at large somewhere in a country that is neither Iraq nor Iran. Defense of our homeland is one thing. Offensive tactics overseas are quite another. Worse yet, when our newly minted enemies find their way over here, where will our troops be to defend us?
The American people have NOT gotten the government they deserve. They asked for a stronger America and peace through nonintervention, yet we have a government of deceit, inaction and one that puts us in grave danger on the international front. The American People deserve much better than this. They deserve foreign and domestic policy that doesn't require they surrender their liberties.
Washington D.C. 20515