|
|
 |
Back to Index Page |
A New Advanced
Physics and Life On Earth
on the 21st Century
By
A. R. Bordon
Dr. A. R. Bordon is a bio-physician working for an institute of basic and applied research in Los Angeles, Southern California. He was born in Brazil of American father and Paraguayan mother and grew up in Argentina and Paraguay. He was project officer of the A.C.T.I.O.N. Project which proves the heuristic possibilities in what is known as the living physics or New Advanced Physics which intersects with the esoteric and idiomaterial. Dr. Bordon is fluent in English and Spanish and has written in Spanish to our website offering this article for publication.
Published in Brother Veritus' Website by request from the author. Published in this website on September 23, 2006.
Science is a
communal endeavor, no matter how nontraditional the data gathering means and
verification methods may be. As a communal activity, traditions rule the means
and methods of scientific truth-seeking.
In neoclassical
physics —the
post-Einstein physics ruled by the Standard Model— the means are theory and model-making, and the
method is an empiric one: experimentation. In the “soft” sciences such as
the social sciences (as opposed to the “hardest” of sciences
—physics),
the method is an experimental nomothetic empiricism. The key to science done
within the Standard Model in physics seems to lie in what is admitted in as
data: it must be “physical” and be propelled by theoretical requirements
prompted by the Standard Model. Even strings and superstrings, highly
mathematical entities, must induce integration of natural physical forces
—the
strong, the weak, electromagnetism and gravity. And when strings are given
sensorial conformations, they are visualized as vibrating single strand,
corkscrew-like and closed loop in shape. The substance of physics then begins at
the Planck limit and extends all the way to the upper limits of the EM range. In
the world, this is operationalized as the domain between infinity and the
infinitesimal.
And then there is
a physics of life, driven by a pursuit of ultimate causation and the theoretical
model and principles by which David Bohm’s enfolded “orders” unfold upward and
downward causality chains. This is not a theistic pursuit to prove God exists
—though
an emerging Working Model hints at a vast and elegant super intelligence as
prime source. Life physics’ unwitting pursuit has turned out to be ultimate
causation (or the decipherment of what happened before the Big Bang in
“negative” time and “negative” space), the formulation of super domains which
stemmed in sui genesis from a T-boundary (which an emergent Working Model
predicts they exist outside the limits of 4-spacetime), and the accessing of a
super continuous plenum by a geometry of interconnectivity through a growing
understanding of discernible rules (which means levels of manifestation by which
causality vectors move “up” or “down” strong negentropic orders of symmetry
[utmost near the T-boundary, and relatively least in 4-spacetime]).
Physical science
today is dominated by a Platonic material realism, in which cause (as upward
causation) stems from the interaction and movement of elementary particles, thus
making this movement of particles the ultimate causal agency of everything in
4-spacetime. “Consciousness” and “mind” in material realism is but a mere
epiphenomenon, totally secondary to the causal power of matter. At the
opposite end of the paradigmatic spectrum, we find monistic idealism, in which
“mind” and “spirit” and “consciousness” reign supreme. In this paradigm,
causation runs in a downward direction
—from
mind and spirit to matter. A complex oscillating biological entity (such as a
human being) acting in the world then behaves with causal power in this
paradigm.
And then, here
comes a physics of life prompted by an initial pursuit of “principles” and
“rules” and “logic” that could operationalize Bohm’s enfolded orders of the
implicate, but which ended up connecting the dots of a model of ultimate
causation and causality. In doing so, those of us who engaged in extension
neurosensing (or ENS) (a form of clairvoyance
—on-demand
prompted and assisted by technological means which used a physics-of-life model
applicable to life on Earth known from the Working Model as biogeosystemics)
connected (or interfaced) with information of such “size” and “density” that
surpassed all previous “takes” as to constitute a veritable cumulus.
From this
gargantuan cumulus of information, the six extension neurosensors began the
arduous, often daunting task of decoding (or translating interfaced cumulus
information into sensorially meaningful information) and deciphering
(interpreting and assigning meaning to decoded accumulated) information. It is
this process that A. R. Bordon led over the last eight years deciphering all
sensorially meaningful accumulations into an emergent picture. And it is this
“picture” that has become our Working Model.
METHOD AND THE EMERGENT PICTURE OF NATURE
What kind of
picture does Nature paint of itself as this Working Model? Well, to use
philosophy as the canvas and philosophical paradigms as the broad-brush with
which the “picture” can be deciphered, we can say that Nature paints itself as
monist-idealist and material-realistic. The Working Model paints her as
idiomaterial (comprising of Bohmian relatively independent subtotalities)
manifested in all of the Model’s super domains as monistic idiomorphs which
undergo a transformative process with definite protocolar “stages” of
transformation
—from
thought-matrix transforms early on, to more condensate-transforms, culminating
in a templaic conformation (or quantum potential) which the working Model says
to work in tandem with 4-spacetime EM templates in a continuous mirrored
“dance.”
Along the way,
traditional terms (e.g., consciousness, spirit, matter, mind, reality, and
particle) ceased to have any meaning at all to the seven of us. The explanatory
demands made by deciphered information almost immediately required a new “languaging
system” that could allow the preservation of integrity and accuracy of the
deciphered information. To wit, languaging system (in the sense used here) is
much more than mere spoken or written language. It must also take into
consideration the method used (extension neurosensing or ENS), the modalities of
information acquired and their innate characteristics, and the sensorial
translations that must be made to make the information intelligible and
accessible to human intellectual demand characteristics.
A neurosensor
interfaces with an information cumulus capable of containing an information
density and bandwidths that far surpass any form of accessing by mere
intellectual means. The kind of information accessed can best be described as
vitalizing, or vitalized. It would come at, often, many different gradient of
enfoldments, will contain visions and emotions and sounds of strange
characteristics
—often
coming from levels of manifestation in which four or more spatial dimensions
expressed the percepts in the neurosensor’s holonomic experience.
Another parallel
and correlative gradient may express emotive information of such depth and
overwhelming power that would require a neurosensor to decode and decipher this
aspect in bite-size fashion using “filters” which allowed him or her to
experience the emotional bandwidth often accompanying other information modality
streams with a modicum of comfort.
Information also
manifested in sound forms, which initially would have little or no meaning to
inexperienced neurosensors.
All in all, the
effort has not been to develop abstractions of sensorial transforms, but to
learn to think and experience in a holonomic fashion. In fact, holonomic
experiencing is the desired medium of decoding all detected “raw” data. Holonomy
—a holophrastic term that captures an entire aspect of the neurosensing
methodology— is the means by, and through which, a neurosensor “fleshes out” the
detected information from a cumulus into a 4-dimensional perceptual gestalt. It
is such gestalten then that serve as the perceptual “platform” from which
meaning could be carefully and systematically derived —although not necessarily
in discrete languaging (i.e., standard spoken and written language, in
Eastern/Western language meaning sets).
Neurosensors
learned to treat “knowings” as “working hypotheses” of what is understood as
“first passage” through the cumul (or information aspect of the cumulus being
deciphered). They are also encouraged to revisit any given cumulus as many times
as necessary to develop increasingly more global grasps of the content
information, or of any one aspect thereof. Thus, it is not uncommon for aspects
of a gestalt to be revisited often for, in doing so, a neurosensor peels more of
the embedded meanings of the gestalt and, therefore, he or she may modify
internal knowledge with more accurate intellectual grasps of the relevant
information under consideration. How many times is this required? As many as
required to have a working understanding of the aspect of a given cumulus of
interest to any one of us.
THE NEW MILLENNIUM
This New Advanced
Physics is quite different from that propounded by the Standard Model. It is
also new in the sense that much of it is far more advanced than our ability to
yet develop the necessary languaging systems to grasp and understand process
models arising from the overall Working Model emerging from this work. It is
also a physics that, while accessed by gnosive means by human neurosensors, it
is also not entirely a product of human intelligence. Eureka moments abound, and
the mathematics necessary to work up formalisms that will suit processes we can
observe gnosively (with the largest, most complex and most advanced tuning
antenna on earth – the human living matrix) and with the aid of nonnative
technologies are requiring extensions of Riemann’s hypothesis well beyond the Möbius
and Merten functions, hyper complex numbers, hyper graphics (“We are no longer
in Flatlands, Toto.”), and David Hilbert’s Hilbert space, co-homologies and
mathematics we yet don’t have human proponents and exponents of them.
One thing we have
come to understand in our bones: the observer figures prominently in this New
Advanced Physics, and causation is upside down. The human, tech-1 type and
tech-2 type applications of all of this are beyond anyone’s imagination to
behold, sometimes including
our own. Its commercial applications abound and the use for, and on behalf of,
humankind quite possible, and cheap, to boot.
And the observer
must also undergo a kind of necessary makeover: we can no longer blame our
presumed limitations and supposed proclivities on our ephemeral “human nature.”
The human body is quite more advanced in construction and functions than
heretofore considered possible and feasible. The work done by our extension
neurosensors is proving this new awareness not only as a 4-spacetime reality,
but also as a broad consideration for how a single human being is actually part
of a far broader over function, inclusive of an interconnectivity yet beyond
current human conception. Pity the independence-minded cowboys of the 21st
century who prize —an impossible— separation from another human being, who think
such a thing as individuality supreme is desirable and hierarchical systems that
perpetuate inequities and dislocations independent of interconnective awareness
is the way of the one and future world. Most of all, the prizing of fear — [fear
from the] the government, the ETs, the
The sum total of
everything created —let’s call that the Unum— which includes our neck of the
woods we know as our 4-spacetime universe is neither a material realist
aggregate of space/time ratios, anymore than it is a monist idealist thought
concoction of a T-boundary (or Thought-boundary) creationists would latch onto
as God, snidely reminding Darwinians that evolution is not godly —and yet
neither have a corner on what is, anymore than the universe is a thought or a
material substance. Actually, the Unum and our universe are an idiomaterial
phenomenon which has led to the appearance of some amazing things: a perfect DNA
based on 24 base amino acids, longevity of body in the half million earth years
range, the capacity of decoupling an information cloud (or spirit-essence) from
one body and coupling it to another, and much more. We live on a planet of such
wondrous diversity. There are coteries of complex oscillating biological
entities on and around our earth, all with their own imperatives, some of which
are less than well intended and more than misguided to our collective
sensibilities. Others exercise their observation in fulfillment of their own
imperatives as well, and we wonder if they care about what we see to be our
plight. A number have extorted their way into our centers of industry and our
scientific laboratories. One biokind we hold in godspell, to borrow Neil Freer’s
term. And a host of others appear in resonant benevolence to our consonant human
view of ourselves as proverbial underdogs. Some of these pity us that we have
not yet come to realize just what we are, while others patiently await our
adolescent evolution. There are a handful, however, that do represent challenges
to us —some severe enough to collectively need to address the specific challenge
represented by the given source. One such challenge is the one we have
undertaken, as the challenger does not measure life in the same way we do, and
we (ALL of us) are responsible for our own biology. And as it if this were not
enough, the same challenge is faced by those others who are around earth, and
who know about this particular challenging situation. In a matter of speaking,
this effort herein represents a kind of “fifth element” solution to a problem
that cannot be solved by standard physics means, and the weaponries derived from
such a paradigm.
Such then is a
capsule of what we know to be life on earth at the turn of the new millennium.
The intent of this blog is to present and represent the work of individuals who
had signed up to assist in the “fifth element” strategy to which this group is
committed. We don’t seek support for any one philosophical bent or worldview,
not a cent for any cause or the promulgation of a given cause. None here are
interested in catholic sainthood or guruship bathed in greenbacks.
Those who were
called and recognized the call for what it is are here. It is what counts.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Out beyond the ideas of wrongdoing and right-doing, there is a
field. I will meet you there." —Rumi
